Sally etchells trial

Quick Search. Property Search. Job Listings. Search Events. Sally Etchells. Follow rochdaleonline. Do you have a story for us?

If you would like further information about how Paycheck Plus can help reduce the likelihood of fraud or if you would like information about having a payroll audit , contact info paycheckplus. Can you afford not to? Request a quote Request a callback. This whole thing has been a nightmare. Mr Rosebury's wife Jill said Etchells kept between seven and 10 Arab horses at stables near her home in Royton, near Oldham, and used to tend to them every day, both before and after work.

She was also a director of the national Arab Horse Society, helping organise the annual show in Marlborough: 'I knew Sally very well and that is what makes the situation worse,' said Mrs Rosebury. Theft: Etchells worked at vehicle bodybuilding firm Ken Rosebury Ltd in Rochdale for more than 25 years before her theft was uncovered. She was also responsible for payment of bills and outside payments to associated companies. When Etchells was confronted, she admitted the money had been paid to the account of a woman that looked after her seven horses.

This was disguised as payments to other companies and the inland revenue. Etchells was asked to leave the firm but before she went, she wiped the payroll system to try and erase any trace of the thefts she had committed, risking non-payment to other employees.

Bosses then found out about the poisonous letters she sent to their suppliers. Etchells also sent a letter to her former manager making threats about the company. Det Con Mark Zebrowski from Greater Manchester Police said Etchells had taken advantage of her position to steal money from her employers 'and lead an affluent lifestyle throughout this period. The views expressed in the contents above are those of our users and do not necessarily reflect the views of MailOnline.

Argos AO. Privacy Policy Feedback. Share this article Share. Most watched News videos Distressing videos reveal conditions inside 'China's isolation camps' Boris Johnson's constituents express displeasure over party row Xi'an resident 'beaten' by anti-epidemic workers for flouting rules Racy videos of prostitute who was arrested with England rugby star Two airliners appear to fly just feet from each other near Luton Dr Anthony Fauci caught on hot mic calling Senator a moron Anti-epidemic workers go viral for using human chain to deliver food Man uses a hammer to destroy BBC's statue created by Eric Gill Rishi's car drives through Westminster as PM set for explosive PMQs Don't tear the pants off!

Comments 66 Share what you think. View all. Bing Site Web Enter search term: Search. Here's why it's relevant now. Pentagon 'aware' of Iranian website's Trump 'assassination' video: Spokesman. Judge Lacey A. Skanska had claimed, in essence, that forecasts ahead of Sally did not rise to the level of requiring intense preparations and the removal of 55 barges on site at the bridge construction.

By the time the weather forecast had changed, conditions were too dangerous to move them, Skanska said. Skanska also had claimed, in part, that Hurricane Sally was such a force that no matter what preparations the company was able to perform, there still would have been significant impact, a claim the court vehemently denied in its opinion.

Instead of following that plan, crews tied the barges to mooring pilings a few hundred yards east of the bridge. Of the 55 barges on site prior to the hurricane, 27 broke loose, crashing into seawalls, landing within inches of homes and taking out a significant portion of the Pensacola Bay Bridge.

The majority of individual cases were filed in state court in the months following the storm, but were all put on hold when Skanska claimed it was protected by maritime law — something that falls under federal jurisdiction. Skanska representatives said in a statement issued Wednesday that they intend to pursue all legal options possible, including appeal.

Immediately following the storm, Skanska put forth its full resources to address the damage as quickly and as safely as possible and reconnect the communities impacted. One significant decision not yet made that will impact hundreds of claimants is whether the cases will be limited to only those claimants who sustained physical damage — such as a barge hitting their property — or if claimants like business owners with strictly economic impacts could file suit.

That decision was before Collier, but he chose to defer it to the state court level to decide. Many businesses struggled to keep employees whose commute had gone from as short as 10 minutes to sometimes hours in the alternate Garcon Point Bridge route.